FEEDS
Login
USERNAME:
Please provide your email address.Please provide a valid email address.

PASSWORD:
Please provide your password.

Forgot Password? Click Here.

First Time User? Click here to Signup
Resource Center
Conflict of Interest in KPMG's Drafting Of Karnataka’s Forest Plan And Coal India’s Vision Plan, Activists Say 
November 04, 2018

The Karnataka Forest department has asked KPMG, the global financial consultanc

 
Tourism and Digital Dystopias this World Tourism Day 
September 27, 2018

World Tourism Day arrives annually on September 27th. The World Tourism Organization (UNWTO) seizes the moment to tout tourism as..

 
Is India Trying to Subdue Kashmir Through Religious Tourism? 
July 17, 2018
The Indian state under the increasing influence of Hindu nationalism is using Hindu pilgrimage sites..
 
“Aswachh Bharat” marks Amarnath yatra 
July 15, 2018

Tourism and Plastic: Exploring the Contours 

June 04, 2018
The threat that plastic poses to the health of the planet has been raising alarm bells for some time..
 
A Place Worth Visiting
May 05, 2012

A Place Worth Visiting

http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/editorial/article3384797.ece
 
05 May 2012

When it comes to tourism and policymaking, successive Five Year Plans appear lost and directionless. Unfortunately, even the proposed recommendations by the expert group leading up to the preparation of the 12th Five Year Plan do not do much to erase the impression. For the last decade, the government has been trying to position tourism — the second largest service industry — as a national priority. The emphasis is on creating world-class infrastructure, effective marketing and enhancing competitiveness of destinations. To its credit, the government has consistently increased the funding over the years to achieve these objectives. Going by the current recommendations, this is set to rise steeply with about Rs.22,000 crore to be spent over the next five years. However, the question is has the money been well spent and the objectives achieved. The answers are not encouraging. The previous plans tried to do many things at the same time, such as promote leisure travel, actively pursue rural tourism and boost mega destinations. It is understandable that a sector as large as tourism needs multiple strategies, but they also need to converge. The past plans failed to deliver. Disappointingly, there appears to be no change in course even in the proposed recommendations.

If earlier plans unintelligently promoted fancy projects such as golf courses, the proposed one fatuously recommends theme parks as a key idea to increase the duration of stay of tourists at important destinations. About 20 parks — similar to the one in Sentosa, Singapore — are on the anvil. Apart from the question of whether the state should squander its precious resources on theme parks, such choices expose the lack of clarity on what the government wants to focus on. Domestic tourism, which contributes about three-fourths of the tourism economy, has not got the attention it deserves. Promoting budget accommodation is crucial to support this sector. The earlier policies, which depended on the State governments to create land banks for building them, failed to deliver. The argument that financial incentives and better coordination by the Planning Commission will ensure the wholehearted commitment of States to the project is unconvincing. The government should get its priorities right and stay focused on its avowed objective of making tourism people oriented. There is much to learn from successful Asian experiences such as Luang Prabang in Laos, where community-based tourism has been working well for years. Unless the destinations are comprehensively developed as good places to live in and their assets and people cared for, tourism cannot flourish and sustain.