Please provide your email address.Please provide a valid email address.

Please provide your password.

Forgot Password? Click Here.

First Time User? Click here to Signup
Resource Center
Is India Trying to Subdue Kashmir Through Religious Tourism? 
July 17, 2018
The Indian state under the increasing influence of Hindu nationalism is using Hindu pilgrimage sites..
“Aswachh Bharat” marks Amarnath yatra 
July 15, 2018

Tourism and Plastic: Exploring the Contours 

June 04, 2018
The threat that plastic poses to the health of the planet has been raising alarm bells for some time..
As Women, Are We Really Economically Empowered A view from the point of view of Tourism 
April 10, 2018

Do we enjoy the same quality of life as our male counterparts? How can we, when the figures of women..

Meet the Majid Squad, a Group that Voluntarily Cleans Filth on Amarnath Yatra Routes 
January 29, 2018
Notwithstanding the National Green Tribunal directions, Governor N N Vohra recently decided that a 60-day-long..
World Heritage Tag Will Not Affect Life In Western Ghats
June 18, 2011
World Heritage Tag Will Not Affect Life In Western Ghats:

India to seek inclusion of 39 sites of the Ghats in Unesco World Heritage List. IUCN team inspected the sites as part of evaluation process


18 June 2011

K.S. Sudhi, KOCHI:

India to seek inclusion of 39 sites of the Ghats in Unesco World Heritage List

IUCN team inspected the sites as part of evaluation process

The World Heritage List tag will not affect the flow of life in the Western Ghats, say experts.

As the country is all set to vie for the prestigious nomination of the Unesco, apprehensions were raised that the status would affect the life of people, including tribals. There were also reports that the Karnataka government would oppose the nomination on these grounds.

The Ministry of Environment and Forests (had proposed the 39 serial sites of the Ghats, considered ashaving universal value, under the natural properties category to be included in the World Heritage List. The committee will meet in Paris for 10 days from June 19.

India has a strong case this time and it will argue that the sites be nominated as a world heritage site during the Paris session itself, according to Dean of the Wildlife Institute of India in Dehra Dun Vinod B. Mathur.

There were several world heritage sites in India, including the Nanda Devi, Valley of Flowers, Kaziranga and the Sundarbans National Park. Some of them were assigned the status as early as 1985. A large number of people lived in these sites and several hundreds visited them annually. However, there was no restriction on movement of people. There was also considerable tribal population in the Sundarbans and no restrictions were placed on their movements. No inhabitants were evicted following the heritage status, said Dr. Mathur.

The sites in the Ghats were either national parks, wildlife sanctuaries or tiger reserves and its management were carried out based on the management plan. The fears raised by some quarters regarding the restrictions were totally unfounded and the Unesco would have no role in the management of the sites, he said.


A two-member expert team from the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) inspected the 39 serial sites as part of the evaluation process. The nominations were made under clauses 7, 9 and 10 of the operational guidelines of the World Heritage Convention, which covered areas that were “outstanding examples, representing major stages of earth's history, including the record of life, significant on-going geological processes in the development of landforms, or significant geomorphic or physiographic features.”

According to the Indian nomination, the Ghats also qualified as an “outstanding example representing significant on-going ecological and biological processes in the evolution and development of terrestrial, fresh water, coastal and marine ecosystems and species of plants and animals.”

It also stated that the Ghats contained “the most important and significant natural habitats for in-situ conservation of biological diversity, including those containing threatened species of outstanding universal value from the point of view of science or conservation.”