FEEDS
Login
USERNAME:
Please provide your email address.Please provide a valid email address.

PASSWORD:
Please provide your password.

Forgot Password? Click Here.

First Time User? Click here to Signup
Resource Center
As Women, Are We Really Economically Empowered A view from the point of view of Tourism 
April 10, 2018

Do we enjoy the same quality of life as our male counterparts? How can we, when the figures of women..

 
Meet the Majid Squad, a Group that Voluntarily Cleans Filth on Amarnath Yatra Routes 
January 29, 2018
Notwithstanding the National Green Tribunal directions, Governor N N Vohra recently decided that a 60-day-long..
 
57,000  
December 22, 2017

The Government of India’s recent “in principle” clearance to the international airport at Jewar, off Delhi, 16 years after the idea was first floated, is one of the sever

 
Sustainability is a choice – if we have the courage to make it 
September 27, 2017

Declaring 2017 as the year of Sustainable Tourism has once again served to highlight how unsustainable mainstream tourism..

 
India Is Weaponizing its Spiritual Tourists 
August 09, 2017

Every July, thousands of buses, trucks, cars, mules, and palanquin bearers crawl up 12, 768  treacherous feet of mountainous terrain to reach the Amarnath cav..

 
Order to stop development work at mangrove park upheld
January 25, 2011

Order to stop development work at mangrove park upheld

http://www.hindu.com/2011/01/25/stories/2011012557940100.htm

25 January 2011

Kochi: A Division Bench of the Kerala High Court on Monday upheld the order of the Additional Director, Union Ministry of Environment and Forests, directing the Pappinisseri Eco Tourism Society in Kannur to stop all development activities in its mangrove theme park.

The Bench, comprising Chief Justice J. Chelameswar and Justice Thomas P. Joseph, upheld the order while dismissing a writ petition filed by N. Unnikannan, president of the society, challenging the order.

The Additional Director had issued the order on October 6, 2010 on the ground of violation of the Coastal Regulation Zone norms and provision of the Environmental Protection Act and rules by the society.

The court observed that it was revealed by the material on record that the Pappinisseri society had undertaken the activities which were prohibited in the Coastal Regulation Zone-I.

The court, which had gone through the reports prepared by a scientist of the Union Ministry of Environment and Forests and also the map of the Kerala State Coastal Zone Management Authority, observed that the activities had violated the Environment Protection Act and rules and affected the fragile eco-system of the area.

Dismissing the contention of the society, the court observed that material on record was sufficient to hold that the area where the park was located came within the Coastal Regulation Zone-I.

The court said the material revealed that the park was established on a stretch of mangrove forest on the banks of the Valappattanam river. The map indicated that the major portion of the area was mangrove eco-system and it was ecologically sensitive. The court was not inclined to accept the contention of the society that there was evidence to show that the mangroves were planted in its property in 2004.